Land-based education and place-based education: Mapping the terrain and resisting conflation

Authors

Abstract

In recent years there has been growing interest in both land- and place-based education in research, scholarship, and K-HE practice. Yet without robust definitions and guiding principles, land-based education is vulnerable to misinterpretation and cooptation by non-Indigenous practitioners. This article maps the historical and conceptual distinctions between land- and place-based education, with specific focus on the “where,” “what,” “why,” and “how” that orients each field. The authors offer examples of how they have implemented land- and place-based education in their own practice. Ultimately, we argue that while land- and place- based education are both valuable approaches to teaching and learning in the Canadian K-12 system, more careful differentiation is needed.

Author Biographies

  • Melissa Twance, Lakehead University

    Melissa Twance is Anishinaabe and a member of Netmizaaggamig Nishinaabeg. She holds a Canada Research Chair in Land Pedagogies and Indigenous Futurities within the Faculty of Education at Lakehead University in Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada. Her research interests include Indigenous ways of knowing, relational pedagogies, land, and community-based education. 

  • Will Burton, University of Winnipeg

    Will Burton teaches social studies and sustainability education methods courses in the Faculty of Education at the University of Winnipeg, Canada. He is a former K-12 teacher and school leader. His current research interests include climate change education and place-based education theory, curriculum and practice in the Manitoba K-12 public education system. 

Downloads

Published

2026-08-05

Issue

Section

Articles